It’s the kind of story that sparks headlines, shares, and maybe even a few tears—but beneath it all is a bitter truth: no child should have to be humiliated to get a meal.
Sixteen-year-old Dominic Gant was looking forward to lunch like any other student at Dowagiac Union High School in Michigan. But when he reached the cafeteria line, he was stopped cold. He had a $5 overdue balance on his account, and cafeteria staff refused to let him eat. He offered the $2 he had, promising to bring the rest later, but they weren’t interested. Instead, they took the lunch tray right out of his hands and tossed it in the trash.
One mom was forced to extreme measures after her son was mistreated by his school.
Representative Cover Image Source: Pexels | Ron Lach
"It was really embarrassing," Dominic told CNN. "Especially because it happened in front of the entire lunch room, the whole classroom. (They) took my plate away, saying I didn't have enough (money) to eat today."
"They took my plate away, saying I didn't have enough (money) to eat today."
— Dominic Gant
Dominic went the rest of the day hungry, humiliated, and angry. When his mother, Amanda Keown, picked him up from school and heard what had happened, she was stunned. And furious.
One mom's powerful response
“I was so appalled that he was denied lunch and had his lunch taken out of his hands over five bucks,” she told NPR. “He was embarrassed. He was also hungry! And I was very, very mad.”
But instead of just venting on social media or demanding an apology, Amanda took action. She marched to the school and paid off not just her son’s balance, but the outstanding debts of 18 other students—$60 total. Just like that, 19 kids no longer had to worry about whether they'd be fed.
"I don't want another kid to go through what my son went through."
— Amanda Keown
“I realize that I don't have to do it,” she said. “But I don't want another kid to go through what my son went through.”
Online reaction and systemic frustration
Amanda’s kindness made national headlines and inspired online praise. But plenty of people couldn’t shake the same question: Why is this even happening in the first place?
The school district’s superintendent, Mark Daniel, said the cafeteria worker responsible was employed by an outside food service company, not the school itself. He issued a public statement expressing regret over the incident, insisting that the district was a “compassionate and caring” one where “every student matters.”
And yet, it’s hard to square that sentiment with the idea of a hungry child being denied food—and then publicly shamed for it.
When CNN covered the story and shared it on YouTube, the reaction was swift. One user, @CommunityUUG, wrote:
"Don't give it to him and then take it away to put it in the trash."
— @CommunityUUG
Another commenter, @HuimisKiss, was stunned that this could even happen in a country as wealthy as the U.S. “Are you seriously trying to say that in the U.S., pupils must PAY for their school lunches? I have NEVER paid anything for going to school/university... Everything is paid with taxes. Actually, I got PAID to go to college. The student allowances. That's one of the biggest reasons people pay taxes! To get free education for everyone!”
Fixing what should never be broken
In countries like Finland, France, or Sweden, the idea of a child being denied food at school is unthinkable. But in the United States, school lunch debt has become so widespread that it’s sparked its own cottage industry of fundraising campaigns. Parents, teachers, and even strangers sometimes step in to erase debts so that kids don’t face “lunch shaming”—a term that shouldn’t exist, but does.
In recent years, lawmakers have pushed to eliminate school lunch debt altogether. Programs during the pandemic provided universal free meals in schools across the country, but those provisions have largely expired. As of 2023, only a handful of states—including California, Maine, and Colorado—have passed laws to make school meals free for all students.
The rest of the country remains patchwork—and in that gap, kids like Dominic get caught. It shouldn’t be up to parents like Amanda to clean up a broken system. Her generosity is admirable. But the fact that she had to be generous at all is the real problem.
If you’re frustrated by this story, you’re not alone. And you can take action. Groups like School Meals for All and Feeding America are pushing to ensure that no child has to go hungry during the school day. Supporting local food banks, contacting lawmakers, and advocating for universal school meals can make a difference.
Because no student should have to trade their dignity for a slice of pizza.
21 everyday phrases that make people silently scream inside
If you’ve ever cringed at hearing “It is what it is” or rolled your eyes at someone saying “No offense…” before delivering something totally offensive, you’re definitely not alone. Some expressions are so irritating, so overused, or so grammatically cursed that hearing them once more might just push us over the edge.
We asked our Facebook audience, “If you could ban one annoying phrase from existence forever, what would it be?” and holy moly, did the floodgates open. Typically, a given question might rack up around 5,000 comments—but this one? Over 14,000. People shared responses that were funny, petty, brutally honest, and occasionally downright poignant. From phrases that try (and fail) to sound wise, to those so overused they've lost all meaning entirely—here are the top contenders folks are completely done with.
The one phrase nearly everyone wants to vanish
By far the most repeated offender was:
Over and over, users cited this as the ultimate non-response. It’s dismissive, it ends conversations, and it offers exactly zero comfort or help.
Another big category? Expressions meant to comfort that end up being painful or insulting. These include:
Many commenters explained that these phrases, while often well-intentioned, feel dismissive in times of grief or hardship.
Grammar gripes and word crimes
Grammar lovers had a lot of feelings. Some of the most-cited “please stop saying this” phrases included:
And let’s not forget the collective rage over “pacifically” when people mean “specifically.”
Words that reveal more than they intend
Several users took issue with phrases that feel passive-aggressive or intellectually lazy, such as:
As user Jacqueline C. put it, “'To be honest...' What does that mean? That you're not honest any other time?”
Phrases tied to racism, sexism, or toxic positivity
A significant number of respondents took aim at harmful or politically charged phrases. Among them:
These comments weren’t just about annoyance—they were about the emotional weight and social impact of language.
James G. didn’t mince words when he wrote: “‘Go back to your country, then’ 🤬. The epitome of racist. I love my country, plus my ancestors did not ASK to be brought here the way they were.”
Corporate speak and empty buzzwords
You knew these were coming.
These phrases sparked a different kind of rage—one reserved for staff meetings and marketing emails.
Iris H. summed it up: “Most corporate speak. Downsizing. Low hanging fruit. Pivot. etc…..” Just say what you mean, please.
Why this resonated so deeply
There’s something unifying about shared irritation. These phrases might seem harmless or routine, but for many people, they’re like verbal paper cuts—tiny annoyances that, over time, sting a lot more than they should.
Whether it’s poor grammar, dismissive condolences, or flat-out hate speech in disguise, we’re collectively craving language that’s thoughtful, clear, and kind.
So the next time you find yourself reaching for one of these expressions, take a beat. Maybe there’s a better way to say what you mean. Or maybe… just don’t say anything at all.
And if you’ve got your own phrase that should be banished from existence? Don’t worry—there’s still time to add to the list.
Got another phrase that needs to go? Drop it in the comments on our original Facebook post.
Bonus: The top five most hated phrases from our poll
Let’s make 2025 the year we finally stop saying all of them.